BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:Linklings LLC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Phoenix
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Phoenix
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:19700101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20241014T203102Z
LOCATION:McArthur Ballroom
DTSTART;TZID=America/Phoenix:20240911T173000
DTEND;TZID=America/Phoenix:20240911T183000
UID:HFESAM_ASPIRE - Presented by HFES_sess107_POS291@linklings.com
SUMMARY:90. Does Prosocial Automation Increase Driver’s Well-Being?
DESCRIPTION:Poster\n\nShashank Mehrotra, Kumar Akash, and Teruhisa Misu (H
 onda Research Institute USA) and John Lee and SooYeon Kim (University of W
 isconsin - Madison)\n\nAs societies transition to hybrid mobility systems,
  interactions between automated vehicles (AVs) and human users in public s
 paces become more complex, highlighting the critical role of prosocial beh
 aviors. These behaviors are essential for the seamless operation of interd
 ependent transportation networks, helping to address integration challenge
 s of AVs with human-operated vehicles and enhancing well-being by creating
  more efficient, less stressful, and inclusive environments. This study ex
 plores the impact of receiving prosocial behaviors on the cognition, perfo
 rmance, and well-being of micromobility users in simulated urban traffic s
 cenarios. Using a mixed-method design, the research contrasts two types of
  social interactions—prosocial and asocial—across three temporal condition
 s: relaxed, neutral, and urgent. The structural equation model (SEM) findi
 ngs suggest that improved cognition and emotional well-being, influenced b
 y satisfaction and social interactions, is linked to better riding perform
 ance, shown by lower minimum TTC. Incorporating social factors into drivin
 g systems could enhance safety and improve urban mobility solutions.\n\nTr
 ack: Aerospace Systems, Cognitive Engineering & Decision Making, Computer 
 Systems, Forensics Professional, Health Care, Human Performance Modeling, 
 Individual Differences in Performance, Perception and Performance, Product
  Design, Safety, Training, Usability and System Evaluation, Extended Reali
 ty\n\nTopics: DEI
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR