BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:Linklings LLC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Phoenix
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Phoenix
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:19700101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20241014T203101Z
LOCATION:FLW Salon A
DTSTART;TZID=America/Phoenix:20240911T115500
DTEND;TZID=America/Phoenix:20240911T121500
UID:HFESAM_ASPIRE - Presented by HFES_sess189_LECT371@linklings.com
SUMMARY:Use of a Head-Worn Display for Approach and Landing in a Transport
  Category Aircraft: Does Monocular Viewing Impact Pilot Performance and Wo
 rkload?
DESCRIPTION:Lecture\n\nDavid Newton (Federal Aviation Administration, Texa
 s Tech University); Eric Greenlee (Texas Tech University); and Theodore Mo
 fle, Farzaneh Shahini, Rebecca DiDomenica, and Inchul Choi (Cherokee Natio
 n 3S)\n\nWhen manually flying an approach and landing, pilots can use a He
 ad-Up Display (HUD), binocular Head-Worn Display (HWD), or monocular HWD t
 o view flight symbology that is superimposed onto their view of the runway
  environment. There are design differences across these displays that coul
 d impact pilots’ performance and workload while flying. Based on these con
 cerns, an experiment was conducted where 18 Airline Transport Pilot Captai
 ns flew approach, landing, and rollout scenarios with varying visibility l
 evels in a Level D-equivalent Boeing 737 flight simulator. Pilots manually
  flew each scenario while using flight symbology presented on a HUD, binoc
 ular HWD, or monocular HWD. Pilots rated their workload during each scenar
 io using the NASA-TLX. While flightpath tracking and energy management per
 formance was not impacted by display type, pilot workload was highest when
  flying with a Monocular HWD and lowest when flying with a HUD. The operat
 ional takeaway and theoretical implications are discussed.\n\nTrack: Aeros
 pace Systems\n\nSession Chairs: Arjun Rao (The Boeing Company) and Kathari
 ne Sabo (Clemson University)
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR